Archive for February, 2006
Fact: Sexual activity at an early age has multiple harmful consequences.
The earlier a teenage girl begins sexual activity the more likely she is to suffer from increased rates of infection with sexually transmitted diseases, increased rates of out-of-wedlock pregnancy and birth, increased rates of single parenthood, decreased marital stability, increased maternal and child poverty, increased [...]
I hear this one a lot and I usually respond by trying to educate the speaker. Every piece of legislation here in the United States is based on some type of moral (often Judeo-Christian) conviction. For example, laws against murder and theft can be easily traced to the Ten Commandments (”Thou shall not kill,” and [...]
Throughout history, people have suggested that the legalization of contraband (such as alcohol and drugs) and certain activities (such as prostitution) will allow the demand for these substances and activities. On the contrary, experience tells us that this just isn’t true. When the use of pornography is allowed to proliferate, the following tends to occur:
• Some [...]
A great deal of evidence suggests that repeated exposure to pornography leads to the probability of acting out sexually rather than reducing dangerous impulses. Even when addiction to pornography does not lead to the commitment of serious sex crimes, it cannot be considered a harmless outlet for dangerous impulses. The viewing of pornography often creates [...]
Some people actually believe that pornography has little or no effect on those who view it. However, research studies show that pornography has the potential to harm individuals and our culture.
The First Amendment gives us freedom of speech and protects our right to express ourselves freely. Unfortunately there are those who have perverted this freedom to meet their own self-serving needs and the sexual appetites of the consumers. For more than forty years, however, the Supreme Court has held that obscenity is “outside the protection [...]
May people argue that obscenity cannot be defined, that it is a matter of opinion. However, in the Supreme Court case of Miller v. California, a clear, concise definition of obscenity is given. In layperson’s terms, obscenity includes graphic material that contains recurring sexual activity and/or sexual violence that is unmistakably offensive and lacking in [...]
Search
About
You are currently browsing the The Abstinence Clearinghouse Blog weblog archives for February, 2006.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
- In Defense of Maintaining Your Virginity
- College Women the Truth about “Safe Sex”
- “Gardasil Vaccine Doubts Grow”
- Gardasil Vaccine Doubts STILL Growing!
- Permissiveness
- Marriage
- College Women of Today
- Sex Images on His Web Site Lead Chief Judge to Stop Trial
- One Hundred Billion Dollar Man
- Hollywood’s Teen Sexploitation
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- "Comprehensive" Sex Ed (13)
- Abstinence (166)
- Adventures in Missing the Point (8)
- Book Reviews (3)
- Contraception: Hormonal (4)
- Contraception: Prophylactics (9)
- Doings Elsewhere (1)
- Everything is Unconstitutional (1)
- Guest Commentary (2)
- HIV/AIDS (6)
- Media Bits (4)
- Planned Parenthood (7)
- Pornography (4)
- Potpourri (4)
- Press Releases (4)
- Principles of Education (6)
- Prostitution/Sex Trade (4)
- Quotes (3)
- STDs (8)
- Teenage and Child Sexuality (10)
- The Culture (11)
